Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 5:37:56 GMT 1
Which was established for the crimes of blackmail and listening to and recording the conversations between people committed against the defendant on 03.08.2011, can be evaluated within the scope of the right to privacy, as a result of the appeal review based on the requests of the defendant and his participating attorney (…). participant's private life conversations is prohibited under TCK Article 134/1-2. Considering that it constitutes the crime of violating the privacy of private life regulated in the sentence, a conviction must be given for this crime.
Supreme Court 12th CD, 2020/851 E., 2021/220 K.) Violation of France Telegram Number Data Privacy by Recording Images or Sounds In the incident where the defendant disclosed the telephone conversation he had with Participant The action of the defendant, who kept the existence and extent of the relationship between him and the defendant secret and sent the audio recording containing the conversations within the scope of the participant's private life to the husband of the pt of recording the participant's private life conversations is prohibited under TCK Article 134/1-2. Considering that it constitutes the crime of violating the privacy of private life regulated in the sentence, a conviction must be given for this crime. (Supreme Court 12th CD, 2020/851 E., 2021/220 K.)
Violation of Privacy by Recording Images or Sounds In the incident where the defendant disclosed the telephone conversation he had with Participant The action of the defendant, who kept the existence and extent of the relationship between him and the defendant secret and sent the audio recording containing the conversations within the scope of the participant's private life to the husband of the participant, since the legal elements of the crime of violating the confidentiality of communication defined in the 3rd paragraph of Article 132 of the TCK were not realized in the concrete case, due to not disclosing it in the media, It should be taken into consideration that disclosing the images or sounds in the 2nd paragraph of Article 134 will constitute the crime of violating the privacy of private life .
Supreme Court 12th CD, 2020/851 E., 2021/220 K.) Violation of France Telegram Number Data Privacy by Recording Images or Sounds In the incident where the defendant disclosed the telephone conversation he had with Participant The action of the defendant, who kept the existence and extent of the relationship between him and the defendant secret and sent the audio recording containing the conversations within the scope of the participant's private life to the husband of the pt of recording the participant's private life conversations is prohibited under TCK Article 134/1-2. Considering that it constitutes the crime of violating the privacy of private life regulated in the sentence, a conviction must be given for this crime. (Supreme Court 12th CD, 2020/851 E., 2021/220 K.)
Violation of Privacy by Recording Images or Sounds In the incident where the defendant disclosed the telephone conversation he had with Participant The action of the defendant, who kept the existence and extent of the relationship between him and the defendant secret and sent the audio recording containing the conversations within the scope of the participant's private life to the husband of the participant, since the legal elements of the crime of violating the confidentiality of communication defined in the 3rd paragraph of Article 132 of the TCK were not realized in the concrete case, due to not disclosing it in the media, It should be taken into consideration that disclosing the images or sounds in the 2nd paragraph of Article 134 will constitute the crime of violating the privacy of private life .